By BRETT ZONGKER, Associated Press Writer1
hour, 21 minutes ago
A federal appeals court
overturned the District of Columbia's
long-standing handgun ban Friday, rejecting the
city's argument that the Second Amendment right to
bear arms applied only to militias.
In a 2-1 decision, the judges
held that the activities protected by the Second
Amendment "are not limited to militia service, nor
is an individual's enjoyment of the right
contingent" on enrollment in a militia.
The ban on owning handguns
went into effect in 1976.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit also threw out
the district's requirement that registered
firearms be kept unloaded, disassembled and under
trigger lock.
In 2004, a lower-court judge
told six city residents that they did not have a
constitutional right to own handguns. The
plaintiffs include residents of high-crime
neighborhoods who wanted the guns for protection.
"The district's definition of
the militia is just too narrow," Judge Laurence
Silberman wrote for the majority Friday. "There
are too many instances of 'bear arms' indicating
private use to conclude that the drafters intended
only a military sense."
Judge Karen Henderson
dissented, writing that the Second Amendment does
not apply to the District of Columbia because it
is not a state.
The Bush administration has
endorsed individual gun-ownership rights, but the
Supreme Court has never settled the issue.
"I think this is well
positioned for review of the Supreme Court," said
Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at
George Washington University. He said the D.C.
circuit is historically influential with the
Supreme Court because it often deals with
constitutional questions.
"You also have a very
well-reasoned opinion, both in the majority and
the dissent," Turley said.
If the dispute makes it to
the high court, it would be the first case in
nearly 70 years to address the Second Amendment's
scope.
Silberman wrote that the
Second Amendment is still "subject to the same
sort of reasonable restrictions that have been
recognized as limiting, for instance, the First
Amendment."
Such restrictions might
include gun registration, firearms testing to
promote public safety or restrictions on gun
ownership for criminals or those deemed mentally
ill.
Wayne LaPierre, executive
vice president of the National Rifle Association,
said the decision gives the district "a crack in
the door to join the rest of the country in full
constitutional freedom."
A spokeswoman for the
district attorney general's office declined to
comment on the ruling.